Pokrewne
- Strona Główna
- Charles M. Robinson III The Diaries of John Gregory Bourke. Volume 4, July 3, 1880 May 22,1881 (2009)
- John Marsden Kroniki Ellie 1. Wojna się skończyła, walka wcišż trwa
- Adams G.B. History of England From the Norman Conquest to the Death of John
- Marsden John Kroniki Ellie 03 Przycišgajšc burzę
- DeMille Nelson John Corey 01 liwkowa Wyspa
- John Ringo Dziedzictwo Aldenata 03 Taniec z Diabłem
- Wojny Rady Tom 1 Tam Będš Smoki Ringo John
- Tom Mangold, John Penycate Wi podziemna wojna
- Morris West Arcydzielo (2)
- Charles Dickens Klub Pickwicka
- zanotowane.pl
- doc.pisz.pl
- pdf.pisz.pl
- wrobelek.opx.pl
[ Pobierz całość w formacie PDF ]
.I wantyou to do it from the point of view of being in a watchingthat you see what you would see if you were actuallydriving across the bridge.What happens when you do that?Tammy: (She raises her eyebrows, looks slightly puzzled.) I droveacross the bridge."I drove across the bridge." What could be a more elegant response?If she had told me "I was so happy driving across the bridge," I'd sayWait, it's just an ordinary bridge."Tammy: But always before when I drove across a bridge, Iimmediately began to program myself "What am I going to do whenthe car goes off the side?"And what did she say this time? "I just drove across the bridge."When you associate the strength and confidence with those auditoryand visual stimuli, driving across a bridge another humanactivity, the same as the experience that the rest of you have haddriving across bridges your whole life.This is also a way of testing ourwork to find out if it is adequately future-paced.We know what shelooked like when she had a phobic response.If the same phobicresponse comes up, we know somehow the integration didn't happen.find out what happened and re-do it.Her response was "Oh,driving across the bridge." Earlier, Linda, we were talking aboutachoring the new response to a cue from the environment.Here we'retesting and we're bridging or future-pacing at the same time.Woman: Can you do this with yourself?Yes, with two qualifications.Tomorrow we're going to teach apattern called "refraining" which teaches you how to establish aninternal communication system with some sophistication and subtlety.If you have such an internal communication system, you can alwayscheck internally to make sure that all parts of are congruent.If youget a "go-ahead," of course you can do it by If there's somehesitation, reframing gives you a way of getting congruence, internalagreement.Another precaution is that you get a really good anchor for apowerful, positive "blast-out" experience, so that if you begin tocollapse back into the old unpleasant feelings, you can bring yourselfout.Feeling more unpleasantness will not help in this at all.I had apowerful anchor.Make sure you have one for yourself.I wouldrecommend that you do it with somebody else if you have a very 119intense phobic response.It isn't that difficult, and it obviouslytake that long.Find somebody else, if only to operate the bail-outanchor if you begin to go back into the unpleasantness.You can goslightly into the phobic response and say to your friend "Look at what Ilook like now, and what I'm breathing like now.If you see that again,squeeze my hand." That would be adequate.You can run the rest of ityourself.Woman: Can you do this with children?Children don't seem to have that many phobias.For those who do,this will work fine.Whatever you do with kids, I recommend that yousneak up on it.A friend of mine had a nine-year-old kid who was alousy speller.I said "Look at this list spelling words." The kidlooked at it, and I said "Now close your eyes and tell me what theyhow to spell them." He had some difficulty doing that; hedidn't have well-developed visualization.However, I said "Rememberthe in Star Do you remember when the Wookie openedhis mouth and showed his teeth like this?" And he went "Oh,and then he was visualizing immediately.I had him print the words outin the mouth.There's always some experience somewhere ina person's personal history that has the requisite qualities you need.Ifyou combine that experience with the task that you are trying toand especially with children, make a game out of is noproblem."What do you think the Wookie would see if he werewatching you go through that thing with your dad?" That's anotherway of getting the dissociation.Children are really fast.As an adult you are a lot slower a child.You are less fluid in your states of consciousness.The primary tool thatwe offer people who work with children is to use anchoring a way ofstabilizing what you are trying to work on, to slow the kid downenough so that you can cope.Because kids are really fast.Woman: Why two steps of dissociation?You don't need it.That's just a guarantee; it's insurance that shedoesn't collapse back into the old feelings.If we had only dissociatedher one step, if she collapsed she would collapse right into the oldexperience, and it would be very difficult to get her back out.By doingit in two steps, if she begins to collapse, she will collapse into the firststep and it's easier to get back out.can tell whether is up aboveor back down here by the changes in posture and skin color andbreathing, etc.Knowing that, if I see her collapse from two to one, Igive a squeeze here, or I say "Now let her the old feelings over 120You watch from up Those are ways of insuring that she doesn'tjust re-experience the bad feelings.Woman: You asked Tammy to take the feeling and find a pictureof herself at a younger age.What if she can't find one?That's a statement about the therapist, not the client.It should betaken as a comment about what the therapist is doing, indicating thatthe therapist should change his behavior and do it differently.Let me answer your question in this way.I don't believe that Tammyactually had the experience that she watched herself go through.Shemay or may not have; I don't know.But it is irrelevant.Once a verywell-known therapist was visiting with us, and we received anemergency referral, a suicidal woman.The psychiatrist had given up,saying "Here, would you please take this woman over? I'm out ofchoices." Since this famous therapist was staying with us, we thought itwould be an unprecedented opportunity to demonstrate some of theuses of hypnosis Erickson had taught us.Because for that therapist, atthat point in his evolution, hypnosis was a dirty word.He thought itwas "manipulative." And we told him "There are ways in whichhypnosis is far less manipulative than any insight,conscious-mind therapy we have ever run across.Let us demonstratewith this woman."So we began to work with this woman.The visiting therapist wassitting there watching and About ten minutes into thesession, he got a revelation.It was obvious.I said "Do you havesomething you want us to do?" I had never had a chance to watch thistherapist work live before.He took over and started goingchildhood, younger motherHe developed this incredible fantasy, which he then essentially "sold"to this woman.At first the woman would go "Gee, I don't rememberanything like that." Finally the woman went That's it! Imust have done it!" very much like a family reconstruction, ifever been through one of those with Virginia Satir.Suddenly thewoman made all these internal connections, and the visiting therapistdid all this therapy about this past experience and the woman changeddramatically.Her behavior changed dramatically, and she stayedchanged, too.She was a continuing client of ours.Now, when she came back in two weeks, we resist.Weinduced a somnambulistic trance, and established an anchor foramnesia so that we could erase anything we did during thatbecause she was doing fine and we didn't want to interfere.We just 121wanted to check and find out what had happened.We asked herunconscious mind if in fact the experience described by the therapistduring the anything approximating everThe answer was unequivocally "No." However, that is no differentthan what just happened here.If the experience that Tammy generatedhas all the elements of whatever the original experience or set ofexperiences was, it will serve as a metaphor which as effective asan actual, factual, historical representation.And from my sensoryexperience I can guarantee that it was effective [ Pobierz całość w formacie PDF ]
zanotowane.pl doc.pisz.pl pdf.pisz.pl agnieszka90.opx.pl
.I wantyou to do it from the point of view of being in a watchingthat you see what you would see if you were actuallydriving across the bridge.What happens when you do that?Tammy: (She raises her eyebrows, looks slightly puzzled.) I droveacross the bridge."I drove across the bridge." What could be a more elegant response?If she had told me "I was so happy driving across the bridge," I'd sayWait, it's just an ordinary bridge."Tammy: But always before when I drove across a bridge, Iimmediately began to program myself "What am I going to do whenthe car goes off the side?"And what did she say this time? "I just drove across the bridge."When you associate the strength and confidence with those auditoryand visual stimuli, driving across a bridge another humanactivity, the same as the experience that the rest of you have haddriving across bridges your whole life.This is also a way of testing ourwork to find out if it is adequately future-paced.We know what shelooked like when she had a phobic response.If the same phobicresponse comes up, we know somehow the integration didn't happen.find out what happened and re-do it.Her response was "Oh,driving across the bridge." Earlier, Linda, we were talking aboutachoring the new response to a cue from the environment.Here we'retesting and we're bridging or future-pacing at the same time.Woman: Can you do this with yourself?Yes, with two qualifications.Tomorrow we're going to teach apattern called "refraining" which teaches you how to establish aninternal communication system with some sophistication and subtlety.If you have such an internal communication system, you can alwayscheck internally to make sure that all parts of are congruent.If youget a "go-ahead," of course you can do it by If there's somehesitation, reframing gives you a way of getting congruence, internalagreement.Another precaution is that you get a really good anchor for apowerful, positive "blast-out" experience, so that if you begin tocollapse back into the old unpleasant feelings, you can bring yourselfout.Feeling more unpleasantness will not help in this at all.I had apowerful anchor.Make sure you have one for yourself.I wouldrecommend that you do it with somebody else if you have a very 119intense phobic response.It isn't that difficult, and it obviouslytake that long.Find somebody else, if only to operate the bail-outanchor if you begin to go back into the unpleasantness.You can goslightly into the phobic response and say to your friend "Look at what Ilook like now, and what I'm breathing like now.If you see that again,squeeze my hand." That would be adequate.You can run the rest of ityourself.Woman: Can you do this with children?Children don't seem to have that many phobias.For those who do,this will work fine.Whatever you do with kids, I recommend that yousneak up on it.A friend of mine had a nine-year-old kid who was alousy speller.I said "Look at this list spelling words." The kidlooked at it, and I said "Now close your eyes and tell me what theyhow to spell them." He had some difficulty doing that; hedidn't have well-developed visualization.However, I said "Rememberthe in Star Do you remember when the Wookie openedhis mouth and showed his teeth like this?" And he went "Oh,and then he was visualizing immediately.I had him print the words outin the mouth.There's always some experience somewhere ina person's personal history that has the requisite qualities you need.Ifyou combine that experience with the task that you are trying toand especially with children, make a game out of is noproblem."What do you think the Wookie would see if he werewatching you go through that thing with your dad?" That's anotherway of getting the dissociation.Children are really fast.As an adult you are a lot slower a child.You are less fluid in your states of consciousness.The primary tool thatwe offer people who work with children is to use anchoring a way ofstabilizing what you are trying to work on, to slow the kid downenough so that you can cope.Because kids are really fast.Woman: Why two steps of dissociation?You don't need it.That's just a guarantee; it's insurance that shedoesn't collapse back into the old feelings.If we had only dissociatedher one step, if she collapsed she would collapse right into the oldexperience, and it would be very difficult to get her back out.By doingit in two steps, if she begins to collapse, she will collapse into the firststep and it's easier to get back out.can tell whether is up aboveor back down here by the changes in posture and skin color andbreathing, etc.Knowing that, if I see her collapse from two to one, Igive a squeeze here, or I say "Now let her the old feelings over 120You watch from up Those are ways of insuring that she doesn'tjust re-experience the bad feelings.Woman: You asked Tammy to take the feeling and find a pictureof herself at a younger age.What if she can't find one?That's a statement about the therapist, not the client.It should betaken as a comment about what the therapist is doing, indicating thatthe therapist should change his behavior and do it differently.Let me answer your question in this way.I don't believe that Tammyactually had the experience that she watched herself go through.Shemay or may not have; I don't know.But it is irrelevant.Once a verywell-known therapist was visiting with us, and we received anemergency referral, a suicidal woman.The psychiatrist had given up,saying "Here, would you please take this woman over? I'm out ofchoices." Since this famous therapist was staying with us, we thought itwould be an unprecedented opportunity to demonstrate some of theuses of hypnosis Erickson had taught us.Because for that therapist, atthat point in his evolution, hypnosis was a dirty word.He thought itwas "manipulative." And we told him "There are ways in whichhypnosis is far less manipulative than any insight,conscious-mind therapy we have ever run across.Let us demonstratewith this woman."So we began to work with this woman.The visiting therapist wassitting there watching and About ten minutes into thesession, he got a revelation.It was obvious.I said "Do you havesomething you want us to do?" I had never had a chance to watch thistherapist work live before.He took over and started goingchildhood, younger motherHe developed this incredible fantasy, which he then essentially "sold"to this woman.At first the woman would go "Gee, I don't rememberanything like that." Finally the woman went That's it! Imust have done it!" very much like a family reconstruction, ifever been through one of those with Virginia Satir.Suddenly thewoman made all these internal connections, and the visiting therapistdid all this therapy about this past experience and the woman changeddramatically.Her behavior changed dramatically, and she stayedchanged, too.She was a continuing client of ours.Now, when she came back in two weeks, we resist.Weinduced a somnambulistic trance, and established an anchor foramnesia so that we could erase anything we did during thatbecause she was doing fine and we didn't want to interfere.We just 121wanted to check and find out what had happened.We asked herunconscious mind if in fact the experience described by the therapistduring the anything approximating everThe answer was unequivocally "No." However, that is no differentthan what just happened here.If the experience that Tammy generatedhas all the elements of whatever the original experience or set ofexperiences was, it will serve as a metaphor which as effective asan actual, factual, historical representation.And from my sensoryexperience I can guarantee that it was effective [ Pobierz całość w formacie PDF ]